Monday, March 31, 2008

Review: The Yamaha CG171SF Flamenco Guitar

Author's 2009 Note
Since the time that I have put this review up, it seems to have become the most-read review of the Yamaha CG171SF and it has made it to the top of Google's search. The images have also been used for auctions on eBay without my authorization. I don't want to take down the high-resolution images because these are helpful to readers who want to carefully evaluate this guitar.

Sellers on eBay are free to provide a link to this blog post if they want to provide prospective buyers with an independent third-party review. Nobody however is authorized to use these images of my guitar but myself. Any violations will have their auctions removed under eBay's VeRO program.

For the record, I still have this guitar and am very happy with it. I doubt that I will ever sell it.



As some of you who are visiting from the Harmony Central Acoustic Guitar Forum know, I recently acquired a Yamaha CG171SF flamenco guitar; good karma in compensation for my Yamaha C45MA that I am now without. I really love this guitar so this review might be a tad long.

Images can be enlarged to 1400 x 1040 by clicking on them so you can get all the visual details.

Specifications and Pricing
I took most of these from the Yamaha website. Specs that are in italics pertain to my specific unit or were added for clarification.
  • Classification: Student flamenca blanca
  • Top: Solid European Spruce
  • Back & Sides: Laminated Cypress
  • Neck: High-grade Nato
  • Fretboard: Rosewood
  • Bridge: Rosewood
  • Tuners: Gold-colored
  • Finish: Polyurethane Gloss
  • Frets: 19
  • Body Depth: 3.7" - 3.94"
  • Nut Width: 2.05"
  • String Length: 25.6"
  • Where Built: Hangzhou Yamaha subsidiary in China
  • Date Manufactured: December 27th, 2007
  • Strings installed from the factory: Unknown, Medium Tension
  • Strings currently installed: Hannabach Flamenco, Medium Tension
  • Action on 6th string from the factory: 0.035 on 1st fret, 0.115 on 12th fret
  • Action on 1st string: 0.025 on 1st fret, 0.110 on 12th fret
  • Height of 6th string from top of soundboard at the bridge: 26.5/64 of an Inch (10.52mm)
  • Weight: 3.5 pounds
  • Warranty: Yamaha's Limited Lifetime Warranty (PDF)
  • Manufacturer's List Price: $499.95
  • Typical Street/Online Price: $349.95
  • Discounted Price (during holidays): $299.95
  • Price I paid (from a local Mom-and-Pop authorized Yamaha dealer): $267.00
External Body Details

This is one attractive guitar. As far as traditional flamenco guitars go, the Yamaha CG171SF is a bit more ornate. In the above photo, you can see the decorative purfling along the edges as well as partial detail of the rosette.

The center back strip that separates the bookmatched cypress woods has the same purfling detail. You can see better by clicking on the photo for the enlargement. As you can see from the woodgrain patterns of the heel, the neck is multi-piece (three-piece, I believe).

Here's a further shot so that you can examine the grain of the cypress back. Lovely!

Here's a photo with the full detail of the rosette. The red treble strings are part of the Hannabach Flamenco string set that I installed.

The bridge too has a bit of detail. My apologies for the somewhat sloppy string ties. I was a bit over-eager to install my Hannabachs.

This shot will allow you to examine the detail of the cypress sides. The side width is 3.75 inches on the upper bout which is the same as a classical guitar. I've noticed that many factory-made student flamencas are built with the same side-widths of classical guitars. A high-grade luthier-made flamenca of solid-woods would have side widths that are smaller by about an inch (2.5 cm).

One more back/side shot. The overall weight of this guitar is 3.5 pounds which is lighter than my La Patrie Presentation classical guitar which weighs-in at 4.5 pounds.

Headstock and Tuning Machines

The headstock face seems to have a decorative rosewood veneer. The tuners are gold-colored and the tuning buttons are pearloid plastic in butterfly-styled shapes. I'm tempted to upgrade the tuners to gold-colored Gotoh's, perhaps with ebony buttons. The current tuners however are very smooth and work just fine. If it ain't broke ...

Here's the back of the headstock and you can see the tuning buttons in more detail. I feel that the buttons are the least-attractive component of the CG171SF and (aside from the label inside the soundhole) immediately give-away the fact that this is a student flamenco.

Looking Inside

The kerfing and braces of my CG171SF were smooth and clean. There seemed to be very little excess glue (if at all). Based on my examinations of the latest Yamahas, I get the impression that the new Hangzhou Yamaha factory has slightly improved the interior work of the Yamaha nylon-stringed guitars.

Here's an interior shot looking down towards the tail-block. Again, the kerfing is clean. You can see the two guide-holes for the bridge and the unscalloped braces. Both of these are typical for factory guitars in the sub-$1000 price range. What surprises me is that the braces and interior surface seem to be nicely sanded.

Compare the Yamaha CG171SF interior to this image of a 2007 model La Patrie Presentation that I once had (my current model is a 2008). The La Patrie Presentation is a Canadian-made classical guitar with a solid cedar-top, laminated rosewood backs and sides, and a lacquer finish. In the enlargement, you can that the soundboard and braces are not smoothly sanded, that there is a bit of excess glue on the braces, and that the guideholes for the bridge could have used a bit more cleaning. The Presentation lists for $515 and sells at street/online for $420.

How It Sounds and Plays
This assessment is, of course, subjective but it is based on my experiences of having sampled several other student and high-quality flamencas and classical guitars.

I have set-up the guitar with Hannabach Flamenco medium tension strings which, to my understanding, are not the most preferred flamenco strings. Sound-wise, they don't seem to be much different from the 3-month old factory strings that the CG171SF came with.

Even with this set-up, my CG171SF is clearly a bright-sounding guitar. Although its sustain is shorter than that of my La Patrie Presentation (which is set-up with D'Addario Pro Arte Composite basses and Savarez Alliance trebles), it is a bit longer than what I would have expected from a flamenca blanca (a flamenco guitar with cypress back/sides). In fact, it sounds a bit more to me like a flamenca negra (a flamenco guitar with rosewood back/sides). This might be because of the deeper sides and because the sides and back are laminated. It might also be because of the strings.

I consider these qualities to be a plus. It still has a sound quality that is flamenco (which might become even more flamenco with the right strings) yet it can be adapted for classical. This adds to the CG171SF's versatility.

The action is just right; low enough for fast-fretting without string buzz (see the Specifications section for measurements). I've read that many of today's flamenco guitarists are opting for slightly higher actions in their guitars (almost as high as classicals) for improved volume and less buzz. For comparison, my La Patrie Presentation's action on the 6th string is 0.040 on the first fret and 0.130 on the twelfth.

Versus the Competition
Prior to my purchase, I had made several trips to local guitar stores to compare the CG171SF against the Cordoba flamencas in the $450 to $900 range. I liked the sound (not to mention the build-quality) of the CG171SF much better. Based on discussions that I had read and participated in on Foro Flamenco, the nod for a student flamenca often goes to the CG171SF.

In the $900-$1000 range, it becomes possible to buy an estudio guitar manufactured by a luthier in Paracho, Mexico (consider the guitars made by Francisco Navarro Garcia or the Montalvo guitars from Berkeley Musical Instrument Exchange). Of course, we're now in a price range that is roughly thrice that of the CG171SF.



The CG171SF also gets a recommendation from local artist Jason McGuire (aka El Rubio). The quote below comes from his FAQ section:

Q: What kind of guitar should I buy?
A: Glenn Canin's guitars are the best for me. I own and have played many great and very expensive guitars, but for me Glenn's guitars are magic. His guitars are fairly priced. If you can't afford one now get a cheap Yamaha flamenco from Guitar Center while you are learning. Save up and buy a really nice guitar later. Stay away from mid priced instruments, especially if they are mass produced. That is my advice.
Hmm. Glenn Canin's cheapest flamenca is $4,300. The CG171SF is typically $350 (before a bit of haggling). Stay away from mid-priced instruments.

I can certainly take that advice!


Strings That I'll Be Experimenting With

Based on the advice and readings that I've gotten from Foro Flamenco, these three strings are recommended for flamencas if you prefer medium-tension.
  • La Bella 820B - These are the black flamenco strings from La Bella. They are the ones most commonly used. They seem to be preferred over the new 2001 line.
  • Luthier Popular Supreme 20 - These are often endorsed by flamenco celebrities. I think Paco de Lucia also endorsed them. Scott Tennant of the Los Angeles Guitar Quartet also endorses them.
  • Savarez 540R - It's not unusual to see these as being recommended. Carbon strings are typically brighter and louder than nylon strings. I really like the hard-tension versions of these Savarez strings on my La Patrie Presentation.

Summary: I Am Very Happy

If it isn't already obvious from all the data that I had gathered and presented here, this is one great value of a guitar even if it can't claim a Made In Spain pedigree. I'd have been happy to have gotten it at $350 and am absolutely delighted to have paid $267. We should get to know our local retailers more and support them.

The Yamaha CG171SF solid-spruce-topped flamenco guitar perfectly complements my La Patrie Presentation solid-cedar-topped classical guitar. I have a blond and a brunette to suit my studies and neither cost me an arm and a leg. They cover two ends of the spectrum.

I have since deleted all my automated search-bots for nylon-stringed guitars at auction sites and CraigsList. Guitar Acquisition Syndrome for any other nylon-stringed guitars is gone; at least until I become good enough to warrant a $4000+ guitar (if ChiyoMama would ever let me get away with that).

25 comments:

Anonymous said...

Hi there, thanks for the great review.

I've been checking out your blog off-and-on for a while now. :)

Thanks to you, I picked up a Guitalele a while back from Long & McQuade and played it on stage at the Uke festival in Hayward this past weekend!

I've been eyeing that Yammie flamenco guitar as well, and I was wondering if you could tell me the name of your local mom and pop shop where you got it. I'd be happy to give them my business if I can get a price close to that deal you got!

Joel said...

Awesome review, and great photos. Thank you very much for putting it together. I also fell in love with the CG171SF. Enjoy!

Anonymous said...

I too have the Yamaha CG171SF. I love it!! My guitar looks different from yours in that my fingerboard is a solid black color.
I was told by Yamaha that it was ebony, not rosewood. Your fingerboard is lighter in color and I can see the grain. Yours looks like rosewood. Also, I am not sure our rosettes are the same. Mine was made in 2007.

ChiyoDad said...

Some specs of the CG171SF have changed over the years. It was originally sold with laminated Sycamore backs and sides (instead of the current Cypress) and an ebony fretboard.

At one point, they switch to Cypress (which was good, IMHO). They later switched the fretboard from ebony to rosewood (to which I'm indifferent).

I don't think that the rosette design has changed over these years. I've seen photos of older CG171SFs and they have the same rosette. I think the same rosette is also used on the CG171S and the CG171C

atleo87 said...

wow, because of you, i might buy this guitar! this was by far, the most helpful review. the only competition this guitar has for me is the rodriguez c3. i haven't played either and no local shops sell them so i might have to buy blindly (or rather deafly) from online. any suggestions? by the way, i recognize you from the foro. or atleast what used to be the foro.

ChiyoDad said...

There are certain sound qualities that I like in the Rodriguez C3 but all the six samples that I have played varied greatly in quality. Some were very good and some were very bad. That makes me reluctant to endorse the C3. I would not buy one without playing it first.

Having said that, it is ALWAYS good advice to play a guitar before buying it (or you should at least be covered by a return policy). The Yamahas, however, seem to be among the most consistent in quality control. I would not be reluctant to buy one online (but I would still want a good return policy ... just in case).

I have played one Rodriguez C3F and it buzzed too much, even for a flamenco guitar. It might have just been a bad sample or it might be by design. Right now, I cannot endorse the C3F either.

LearnFlamenco said...

Hi ChiyoDad,

Thanks for the review of Yamaha cg171sf guitar. Do you mind telling me which local guitar store you bought your Yamaha cg171sf guitar? Do they still ofter this good price?

Thanks.

ChiyoDad said...

Unfortunately, their current prices now match the big-box stores. I think it might be the economy and the higher transportation costs. My shop also they gets second-priority on deliveries because of their small volume of sales. I had to wait three months before they got a particular instrument in-stock.

Guitar Center or Musician's Friend will often mark the guitar down to $315 during holidays. They are you better bets at this time and the GC brick-and-mortar stores will sometimes carry 2-3 of the CG171SF at a time.

Islam said...

HI, I'm from Egypt & I'm looking for this Yamaha CG171SF, but unfortunately I couldn't find it except in one Yamaha authorized dealer in Cairo, but it will be a special order which comes after 2 months but at a very high price I can't afford :( as advised from my local dealer, so I need to know the exact worlwide price as of today .. is it still $350 or higher ?, I'm thinking of purchasing it from UAE as I'll be there next month..

Please advise current price..
Thanks for your helpfull subject..

ChiyoDad said...

$350 is the price here in the US. Prices here tend to be lower than the rest of the world.

I believe it sells for 300 British Pounds in the UK. That is US$470 at today's rates.

Anonymous said...

I have some experience playing the classical guitar, and i'm looking to go into flamenco and this guitar seems to suit me perfectly.

I wanted to ask if you guys recommend any instructional videos, books. I don't have much time for an instructor due to grad school.

Thanks

ChiyoDad said...

The best lower-cost self-study text series in English is Graf-Martinez's "Flamenco Guitar Method" Vols: 1-2 with DVDs and CDs. Those are what I would recommend.

If you would like to expand your repertoire beyond those books, get Martin's "Play Flamenco Guitar with Juan Martin". Vol.1 starts are Grade Zero (which would be equivalent to an advanced beginner or early intermediate classical guitar player). Vol.2 would probably be beyond most beginners' abilities.

Daniel said...

It seems the back inside veneer is spruce and the side veneer is cypress What do you think? I know some top of the line Ramirez uses cypress veneer on the sides for volume. I have heard of some construction technique that uses the soundboard wood for the back inside veneer. Your observations will be appreciated.
I am quite satisfied with this guitar. Fitted with a bone saddle and D'Adddario medium composites, this particular guitar will put most of the mid-price ($500 to $1500)in the less-desirable category for certain unless, of course. you find the "needle in the haystack".
I have expensive guitars and I would not trade because this certainly has become my favorite travel and most played guitar. Very solid construction lets me rest easy about care. I will even allow casual players to try it out and not freak about how soft their clothes are so there is no scratches; however, they must wash the hands first!

ChiyoDad said...

I think the inside veneer for the back and sides is also cypress. Yamaha typically uses the same wood for the outer layers. It doesn't look like spruce to me.

The core wood is supposedly mahogany.

IMHO, Yamaha really came-up with a winner on this model.

Anonymous said...

In my country the cheapest price for this guitar is twice as high. Normally the prices of guitars are quite similar to the US prices - not in this case then. Do you think 600$ are still ok for the CG171SF?

ChiyoDad said...

That depends on what the alternatives are at $600. If a lower-end Antonio Aparicio (or other Spanish-made flamencas) can be found in your country for about $600, then it might be a better choice than the CG171SF.

You might even want to see if some of the sellers of the best Mexican-made flamencas would be willing to ship you a guitar. The two best workshops that I trust are those of Alejandro Cervantes ($1000 for his student flamenca) and Francisco Navarro Garcia ($750 for his student flamenca after discount). Alejandro is supposedly working on a new flamenca design. Francisco has started building flamencas based on the designs of Manuel Reyes, but I think his student guitars are still based on the traditional Santos Hernandez design.

Anonymous said...

Hi again and thanks!
Well, here (in Germany) there are few cheap Flamenco guitars aviable, like for 250$ with same official specs as the Yamaha (solid spruce top, cypress body, rosewood/ebony fretboard). There are no reviews on them and I think they have no low action like a flamenco guitar should have. They seem to be ordinary classicals with cypress body...
Ordering from so far abroad will become very expensive, especially because of the high taxes. Oh, and when the instrument proofs to be not the right choice, it gets problematic.
My first flamenca should be inexpensive, and after some time of practise I will go to Spain and buy one there or a German one like the Hanika KF (cherry wood!) or ZF.
Guess the Yamaha will become my choice in a few days...
Thanks for your weblog!

ChiyoDad said...

I would assume that you should be able to get some inexpensive Spanish-made guitars (factory-made, from Valencia) in the EU. You should have many choices: Alhambra, Manuel Rodriguez y Hijos, Esteve, Raimundo and many more. I suggest that you examine these first. I have played some Esteves and Raimundos that are comparable to the Yamaha, but these cost substantially more in the US.

The action could probably be set-up by a competent luthier or technician. In the US, a set-up costs about US$35.

Anonymous said...

I found out that the CG171SF comes with 1,8cm space between strings and top... That's a lot for a flamenca. More than some normal classical guitars have. A flamenca should have no more than 7,5mm space between deep E and top (directly before the tailpiece). And bringing the size so much down will probably make it impossible to get a clear sound out of the guitar.

ChiyoDad said...

Mine measures 1.05cm from the top of the spruce soundboard to the bottom of the 6th string. That's about the same as one of my luthier-made classical guitars. I believe it would be lower than 1cm on a well-made traditional flamenca but, as I alluded to in this review, the CG171SF is more of a classical guitar that has been set-up as a flamenca.

1.8cm is oddly high. I'm wondering if the model you examined had a different saddle installed or if it was a second (defective unit). The CG171SF has a much lower saddle than the other Yamaha CG's.

Rico said...

Interesting review. I was just in a Guitar Center a few minutes ago and out of curiosity, picked one of these up and played it for a while. I was amazed at the quality for the price.

I dare say, it's as comfortable as my handmade Spanish Molina (Malaga), even if it doesn't have the bragging rights. So I Googled it and came across your site.

It's a small world. Jason is a friend of mine from my old flamenco days. An unbelievable musician and a very sweet person. And a hell of a patient teacher.

As him to play you his falsetta based on Zep's Rain Song. He's a consummate musician.

Manan said...

Hi ChiyoDad,

Thanks for this great thread & review.

Could you help me a bit? Where I stay, for some strange reason, the CG171S (which I think is a solid body guitar) sells for around $400 but the CG171SF sells for around $550!!!
(It's actually supposed to be cheaper & not the other way around)

I am just starting to learn Flamenco ... and am not sure if there's that much difference in the 2. Can I use the CG171S as a Flamenco guitar?

Thanks a lot in advance.

ChiyoDad said...

Most teachers will tell you that, for beginners, any classical guitar can be substituted for a flamenco guitar if you make the proper adjustments to it. The CG171S could be used as a flamenca negra. This is a flamenco guitar with rosewood backs and sides and sometimes with the same body depth as a classical guitar. The objective of a flamenca negra is to increase sustain and bass. Paco de Lucia popularized the use of negras.

You would have to adjust its action lower and you would need to add tap-plates (aka golpeadors) to protect the soundboard from your nails. A good luthier or technician should be able to do both. I would also recommend using brighter carbon strings like Savarez Alliance 540R.

The CG171S has laminated rosewood backs and sides (with a core of mahogany). The CG171SF has laminated cypress backs and sides (also with a core of mahogany).

I'm surprised that the CG171SF is selling for more than the CG171S.

Manan said...

Hi ChiyoDad,

Thanks a ton for that reply.

Just a small confusion: So if I look around & can get the CG171SF for the same price as the CG171S, is it *better* to go for the Flamenco model when learning Flamenco? Will the CG171S restrict me to only the flamenca negra style whereas the SF might be more versatile? or does it not make that much of a difference after the modifications you suggested?
Will there be a difference in the sustain in the two models?
Unfortunately I can't try out the two models hands on ... it would have been much easier otherwise.

Thanks.

ChiyoDad said...

If you look at the build specifications of the CG171SF, you'll find that it is essentially a classical guitar (depth is the same) but with laminated cypress for the backs and sides, lower action set at the factory, and golpeadors. I have not compared the CG171SF and the CG171S side by side but I would suspect that they would both exhibit very similar sound characteristics.

There is no such thing as a flamenca negra style; just flamenca negra guitars.
:)

It sounds like you're very new to flamenco. It might be helpful for you to join the forums at Foro Flamenco or Old School Flamenco Foro. Many of your questions had been raised there before.